This article by Michael Spencer (“The Coming Evangelical Collapse”) created a bit of a stir on Christian message boards, blogs, etc. I’m not sure what I agree with, and what I don’t, so bear with me here.
Here is one of the most telling quotes:
Evangelicalism has used its educational system primarily to staff its own needs and talk to itself.
I totally agree with that analysis, and that may be the key to the whole thing. It is hard to exert influence on a culture when you don’t understand anything about it. Evangelicals can go to movies, buy CDs, listen to the radio and buy books that are marketed only to them and which speak a language that is only understood by those who attend church regularly. The heaviest issues in the typical church are: having a great family, having a great marriage, stopping the gays from marrying, and donating to the new building campaign. There is an inability and unwillingness to engage in the culture (beyond being opposed to homosexuality and abortion) that is astonishing.
To best make my point, I can point to one of the great moral debates of the last decade. This issue was debated endlessly on network news shows, National Public Radio, This American Life, major news magazines and newspapers, and yet was (to my knowledge) almost never mentioned in churches: waterboarding. It is, to many people, torture. And it was, the evidence is clear, practiced by the United States government.
The fact that U.S. churches (and Christian radio and Christian magazines and Christian TV) were silent on one of the great moral issues of our day speaks volumes about our complicity with conservatism (which Spencer rightly points out) and our squeamishness about engaging in a dialogue about issues of basic human rights, human dignity and human suffering. It is just the latest issue in which evangelicals have been on the wrong side of history, or have arrived way too late to the party. Some other examples:
* Many Christian conservatives were wrong on the MLK holiday debate in the 80s.
* Wrong on South African apartheid in the 80s.
* Wrong on AIDS for nearly two decades, and horrendously slow to respond. Today, mega-pastor Rick Warren and his wife are devoting considerable resources to this issue, which should be commended. However, in interviews, Mrs. Warren talks as though she just learned about AIDS in the past five years. Honestly, that’s embarrassing.
* Wrong on the environment for what, 30-40 years? While “save the earth” was a college campus mantra back before the Beatles broke up, it is only in this decade that evangelicals have decided to give tentative approval to actually saving trees and rivers. Nice thought, but gosh, where have you guys been?
The list goes on, and on, and on. The church loves to position itself as an agent of change, but its track record suggests it is a cheerleader for the status quo. Which may explain why so many captains of industry and Chamber of Commerce folks feel so comfortable in today’s evangelical church. There is so little discussion of community and accountability, which makes the church little different than the consumer mentality that it ought to be redeeming.
Kudos to Spencer for the article. It’s a lot to think about. While I don’t see a collapse — I don’t see how such a thing is possible, given the mind-boggling numbers at megachurch services and the amounts of money that flows through churches and parachurch organizations — I do see important signs of cultural marginalization. There is no influence on a culture when one has nothing interesting to tell them. Perhaps this dire chapter will end when a new kind of church learns to speak a language that the world understands, and finds compelling. One model — and there are many others in Scripture – would be Paul’s eloquent lecture at Mars Hill. The Apostle knew not only doctrine; he also knew what it meant to be relevant in his culture.
That’s what we need today. While institutional evangelicalism collapses, perhaps a new relevance will be born.